IMPACT report
Anchor Market: your result
This answer uses a made up example company. Change the details above and press Run to see your own result.
Anchor Market
For founders and CMOs. The decision: which market segment do we win first?
Give it what your product does and the segments you are weighing, and you get a score for each segment, a recommended first market, a market sizing framework and a three year expansion path.
Give Anchor Market your product description and the candidate segments you are weighing, along with your current customers, customer pain, average deal size, and sales cycle. When you supply segments, current customers, customer pain, and average deal size, the tool ranks the segments from your own inputs; when any of these is left out, it scores segments on a 1 to 5 scale (out of 25) using keyword presets and prints segment-by-segment questions to test, a market sizing framework, and a three-year expansion path.
This sample is a made up example, built from the inputs behind Fill in an example. It shows part of one section of the answer.
SaaS companies running on two or more clouds comes first under the keyword presets because its description is read as the preset category "tech": the presets do not use your deal size of $45,000 ACV, your sales cycle of 80 days or anything known about your market (current customers and customer pain were not given). Treat SaaS companies running on two or more clouds as the segment to test first for Cloud security monitoring. Two or three facts per segment, from the sector notes and your own deal size and cycle, would break it for this product; the one that helps most is which of these segments already buys from you (current customers), or where buyers raise your problem first (customer pain).
See the full example answer or run it with your own details.
IMPACT report
This answer uses a made up example company. Change the details above and press Run to see your own result.
When a tool is not enough: if the decision needs more than one answer, talk it through in a call. Book 45 minutes with Shashwat.
What next? Work with Shashwat Try another tool See all 85 tools and skills
Generated on 2 November 2026 from this branch, with the inputs behind Fill in an example. Your own inputs give a different result.
IMPACT report
SaaS companies running on two or more clouds comes first under the keyword presets because its description is read as the preset category "tech": the presets do not use your deal size of $45,000 ACV, your sales cycle of 80 days or anything known about your market (current customers and customer pain were not given). Treat SaaS companies running on two or more clouds as the segment to test first for Cloud security monitoring. Two or three facts per segment, from the sector notes and your own deal size and cycle, would break it for this product; the one that helps most is which of these segments already buys from you (current customers), or where buyers raise your problem first (customer pain).
Product: Cloud security monitoring that ranks misconfigurations by real exposure
Average Deal Size: $45,000 ACV
Sales Cycle: 80 days
Method used: keyword presets (not given: current customers, customer pain; with potential segments, current customers, customer pain and average deal size the segments are ranked from your own inputs instead).
Sector: read from your inputs as cybersecurity, cloud security. Business model: not stated. Tell us how you charge and the plan will adjust.
Billing dependent steps are conditional: trials, seats and recurring renewals require a subscription; a statement of work requires a services contract; site or link commitments require connectivity billing. Confirm the applicable choice before using those steps.
What you gave: deal size $45,000 ACV, sales cycle 80 days, current customers not given. The keyword scores below do not use any of these, so use them first:
SaaS companies running on two or more clouds (21 of 25 from the preset category "tech"). Find out (1) whether a proof of value on the buyer's own environment is how SaaS companies running on two or more clouds buyers start, and whether it fits inside 80 days; (2) the objection to expect in SaaS companies running on two or more clouds: "Integration with our SIEM and ticketing", with this pattern of answer from the sector notes: name the integrations available today and test them in the proof of value; (3) whether a team in SaaS companies running on two or more clouds can start on its own and how long a company decision on $45,000 ACV takes after that, against 80 days.
Mid-market fintech and lending companies (20 of 25 from the preset category "midmarket"). Find out (1) the objection to expect in Mid-market fintech and lending companies: "We already have a tool for this", with this pattern of answer from the sector notes: map the overlap honestly and show what the current tool misses, on the buyer's own environment; (2) how long the security, vendor risk and compliance review takes in Mid-market fintech and lending companies before a purchase of $45,000 ACV can be signed, against 80 days; (3) who signs $45,000 ACV in Mid-market fintech and lending companies: the sector notes say "CISO", so ask whether that holds here or whether a committee approves it.
IT services firms hosting client workloads (15 of 25, no affirmative preset category). Find out (1) whether a proof of value on the buyer's own environment is how IT services firms hosting client workloads buyers start, and whether it fits inside 80 days; (2) who signs $45,000 ACV in IT services firms hosting client workloads: the sector notes say "CISO", so ask whether that holds here and whether that person alone approves it; (3) whether a team in IT services firms hosting client workloads can start on its own and how long a company decision on $45,000 ACV takes after that, against 80 days.
These scores are presets, not research on your market: each segment is scored from keywords in its name (enterprise, mid-market, SMB, small, SaaS, tech, finance), and a segment with none of these keywords gets the middle score on every criterion. Your current customers and sales cycle are shown for context; they do not change the scores or the market sizes.
Example figures: replace with your own.
| Segment | Pain | Budget | Access | Reference | Competition | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS companies running on two or more clouds (beachhead) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 21 |
| Mid-market fintech and lending companies | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 20 |
| IT services firms hosting client workloads | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 15 |
Read this as the highest keyword match only: SaaS companies running on two or more clouds scores highest because its description is read as the preset category "tech", not because of anything known about your market. Score each segment yourself with your own data before you commit.
What decided each score: SaaS companies running on two or more clouds: preset category "tech", read from "SaaS companies running on two or more clouds"; Mid-market fintech and lending companies: preset category "midmarket", read from "Mid-market fintech and lending companies"; IT services firms hosting client workloads: no affirmative preset category, so the middle score.
The scores come from words in the segment names, so settle the ranking with these checks:
Example figures: replace with your own.
Highest score (21/25), from the presets:
Before you commit to a segment, check that the roles above exist in its companies, that they can reach your price, and that the sector's usual objections do not block the first sale.
This tool adds no company count, ICP share, market share or deal size of its own. TAM, SAM and SOM are calculated only from the figures you supply: company counts, average deal size, percent matching icp and year one share percent.
| Figure | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Companies in SaaS companies running on two or more clouds | not supplied | not supplied |
| Average deal size | $45,000 ACV | your average deal size |
| % that match your ICP | not supplied | not supplied |
| Year 1 share | not supplied | not supplied |
TAM = Total potential customers × ACV
TAM: cannot be calculated yet
SAM = TAM × % that match your ICP
SAM: cannot be calculated yet
SOM = SAM × expected market share (Year 1)
SOM: cannot be calculated yet
Validation Required: Check your counts against dated records you can inspect and customer interviews on how the segment sees the problem.
Which software fits your case is a judgement call. Ask Shashwat: book 45 minutes at https://calendly.com/shashwat-gtmhelix/45min
Based on the beachhead selection, your ICP likely includes:
Company Characteristics:
Buying Characteristics:
To sharpen this, give: current customers (it would change the ranking, which would follow where your best customers already are); customer pain (it would change the ranking, which would follow the problem your customers describe; with current customers and average deal size it replaces the keyword presets); company counts, one line per segment (it would change the sizing, which cannot yet count companies); percent matching icp (it would change SAM, which cannot be calculated yet); year one share percent (it would change SOM and the Year 1 customer goal).
Next Step: Use Craft Message to build positioning for this beachhead
How the answer is laid out, using the sections the tool prints. Segments are scored on pain, budget, access, reference and competition.
When a tool is not enough: if the decision needs more than one answer, talk it through in a call. Book 45 minutes with Shashwat.
When you enter Product description and Potential segments without Current customers and Customer pain, the tool scores each segment out of 25 (Pain, Budget, Access, Reference, Competition) using keyword presets from the segment names (such as "tech" or "midmarket"), not market research. The In short and How to decide, from your own inputs sections tell you the exact three checks to run on each segment against your deal size and sales cycle, and Market Sizing (your figures only) leaves TAM, SAM, and SOM as cannot be calculated yet until you supply company counts, ICP percentage, and Year 1 share.
Re-run the tool as soon as you have customer pain notes, current customer counts per segment, and segment company counts to replace the keyword presets and complete the bottom-up sizing. The tool applies the same fixed rules every time. It does not call an AI model, and this site does not keep what you enter.
Add IMPACT once (see Use it in Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini), then ask in plain words. Here is a prompt built from the tested example:
My role is not stated. Ask me for my role first. Use IMPACT's Anchor Market tool. product description: Cloud security monitoring that ranks misconfigurations by real exposure; potential segments: Mid-market fintech and lending companies, SaaS companies running on two or more clouds, IT services firms hosting client workloads; average deal size: $45,000 ACV; sales cycle: 80 days. If this tool is unavailable, ask me to open its web page; do not invent its output. In Gemini CLI or Antigravity, use the Helix GTM Suite skills package for related guidance, without claiming to run this connector.
You do not need to sign in. A web browser is enough, and the answer comes back in a second or two.
It applies fixed rules in the IMPACT code to the inputs above and returns text. It does not call an AI model, does not look anything up, and does not store what you type. The web form and the AI assistant connector run the same tool code, so the same input gives the same answer in both.
MCP tool name: impact_anchor_market. REST: POST https://impact.gtmhelix.com/api/tools/impact_anchor_market with this JSON body (see How it works):
{
"input": {
"product_description": "Cloud security monitoring that ranks misconfigurations by real exposure",
"potential_segments": [
"Mid-market fintech and lending companies",
"SaaS companies running on two or more clouds",
"IT services firms hosting client workloads"
],
"average_deal_size": "$45,000 ACV",
"sales_cycle": "80 days"
}
}
Run a Helix tool in your browser, then take the result to ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini. Connectors work with supported plans in Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, VS Code and Windsurf. The Helix GTM Suite skills package supports Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, Cursor and VS Code, and is available through skills.sh. Each plugin has its own installation steps, below or on its own page.
Connector setup guides · Skills package setup guide · Find the skills on skills.sh